Manila: Restrictions on public discussion of the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte could create an 'information vacuum' that may be filled by fake news, misinformation, and disinformation, House prosecutors warned Friday. The warning came as the Senate impeachment court is expected to issue guidelines in the coming days governing public statements and social media posts by parties involved in the proceedings.

According to Philippines News Agency, House prosecutor and Bicol Saro Party-list Rep. Terry Ridon stated that while the prosecution recognizes the authority of the impeachment court to regulate the proceedings, the public should not be left uninformed about a trial of national importance. Ridon emphasized that media interviews, press briefings, and social media posts by the prosecution are intended to help Filipinos understand the technical proceedings and evidence presented before the court. He expressed concern that restricting official explanations could inadvertently allow misinformation and other 'malign actors' more room to shape the public narrative.

Lanao del Sur 1st District Rep. Zia Alonto Adiong remarked that the prosecutors would respect and comply with whatever directive the Senate impeachment court issues. However, he urged the court to apply its rules on public statements and social media consistently to all participants, including the senator-judges. Adiong highlighted instances involving 'spliced videos' posted on social media, noting that the sub judice rule should not be enforced selectively against only the prosecution or defense.

House prosecutor and Manila 3rd District Rep. Joel Chua underscored the public's legitimate interest in understanding the impeachment trial, given that the accused is a high public official elected by the people. While acknowledging that the prosecution is bound by the Senate impeachment rules, Chua advocated for some flexibility to better inform the public about what is occurring inside the impeachment court.

The House prosecutors stated they would await the Senate impeachment court's expected directive and adjust their public engagement accordingly, while continuing to assert the importance of keeping the public informed about the proceedings.