Manila: Prosecutors on Thursday dismissed the growing online attacks against them as a sign of desperation, saying the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte should be judged based on evidence presented before the Senate impeachment court. Private prosecutor Lorna Kapunan stated that the increase in troll activity and personal attacks against the prosecution team should not be mistaken for genuine public sentiment.

According to Philippines News Agency, Kapunan mentioned during a press briefing that the growing number of online campaigns could be amplified through technology, allowing a small number of operators to create the appearance of widespread support. She noted that the attacks against the prosecution have shifted from legal arguments to personal criticisms. Manila Rep. Joel Chua, a member of the House prosecution team, urged the public to assess the impeachment case based on the proceedings rather than social media discussions, emphasizing the importance of truth in the proceedings.

Kapunan also expressed confidence in the prosecution's position should the defense elevate to the Supreme Court any ruling allowing the release of Duterte's bank and tax records. She stated that the defense has the right to question any ruling before the SC, which is part of due process. The prosecution has argued that an impeachment trial is among the recognized exceptions to bank secrecy and tax confidentiality laws.

Meanwhile, the House prosecution panel said the defense would soon have the opportunity to explain the identities of recipients listed in the confidential fund documents of the Office of the Vice President. Chua remarked that both the prosecution and the public are anticipating the defense's response as the trial moves forward. The prosecution is expected to present evidence on the alleged misuse of PHP612.5 million in confidential funds after National Bureau of Investigation Director Melvin Matibag testifies next week.

Deputy Speaker Paolo Ortega V stated that the House investigation had attempted to verify the identities of the supposed recipients through records from the Philippine Statistics Authority. Ortega added that around 200 to 300 names on the list were found to be fictitious, highlighting the challenges faced in verifying the legitimacy of the confidential fund's use.