Manila: Deputy Speaker Jay Khonghun of Zambales expressed concerns on Thursday about the message being conveyed to young Filipinos in light of Senate proposals to allow remote participation and voting for senators who may be absent or facing detention during impeachment proceedings.

According to Philippines News Agency, Khonghun questioned the example being set for the youth, emphasizing that allowing senators to participate remotely without being physically present undermines the importance of showing up for one's responsibilities. He remarked, "What kind of example are we showing to the youth if you are allowed not to show up for your job, if you do not face your responsibility, but you can still cast your vote and participate in the very important impeachment process?"

Khonghun further criticized the idea by questioning whether it is acceptable to continue receiving a salary despite being absent, provided there is a favorable relationship with superiors. His remarks came amid heated debates in the Senate concerning proposals to expand rules on remote participation, especially during crucial impeachment sessions.

The proposal has sparked controversy and even led to a walkout by several senators from the minority bloc, who voiced concerns that the rule change could advantage senators facing potential legal challenges. Khonghun emphasized that impeachment is a constitutional duty requiring full attention and physical presence, stating, "The Filipino people expect senator-judges to personally hear witnesses, examine evidence, observe credibility, and perform their constitutional responsibilities with seriousness and integrity."

Khonghun warned that easing participation requirements for convenience or political reasons could erode public trust in both the impeachment process and democratic institutions as a whole. He noted that many young Filipinos are already disillusioned by perceived double standards within the government.

The Deputy Speaker stressed that his statement was not aimed at any specific senator but addressed the broader institutional consequences of altering established rules during a sensitive constitutional process. He emphasized the importance of maintaining public confidence and upholding values for future generations, stating, "This is bigger than politics. At stake here is public trust in our institutions and the values that we are passing to our next generations."