New York:The UN Security Council's increasing dysfunction and geopolitical rivalries are eroding international law and weakening conflict resolution efforts, according to International Crisis Group President Comfort Ero. In an interview with Anadolu, Ero warned that the body's credibility and legitimacy are at risk.

According to Philippines News agency, Ero highlighted that major power tensions, mutual distrust, and the inability to hold powerful countries accountable are limiting the UN's capacity to maintain international peace and security as conflicts become more interconnected. She emphasized that the UN's functionality is contingent on member states' cooperation, particularly within the Security Council.

Ero expressed concern over the growing military competition and the overlap of regional conflicts, which pose additional challenges for international peace and security. She noted that countries are reassessing security guarantees, strengthening defense capabilities, and reconsidering their reliance on traditional allies.

Furthermore, Ero raised alarms about nuclear proliferation risks and the fragile state of international arms control arrangements. She pointed to conflicts involving Iran, tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, and instability in the Horn of Africa as examples of increasingly internationalized conflicts.

Ero argued that the Security Council's divisions have created an environment where some governments believe they can act without repercussions, undermining international law. She questioned how international systems can constrain countries like Russia and the US when they engage in actions that raise compliance concerns.

The call for Security Council reform, particularly concerning the veto power of its five permanent members, was also addressed by Ero. She expressed skepticism about these members relinquishing their vetoes but noted the potential for non-permanent members to influence decisions.

Ero advocated for a more significant role for the UN General Assembly in holding powerful countries accountable, especially when Security Council divisions prevent action. She highlighted the General Assembly's potential to challenge international law violations and exert political pressure.